From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: OMAP34xx Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:46:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20120207084603.GQ1275@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120204185453.GB17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120204190109.GL20333@atomide.com> <20120204203453.GD17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120205012556.GG1426@atomide.com> <20120205125904.GB11372@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120205172925.GS20333@atomide.com> <4F306016.9010203@ti.com> <20120207002405.GA18209@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4F30B61C.3020801@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:41236 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756572Ab2BGIqP (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2012 03:46:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F30B61C.3020801@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Cousson, Benoit" Cc: Grant Likely , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 06:26:52AM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > Moreover, with Rob latest series, IRQ_DOMAIN will be enabled on every > ARM platform, so the "depend IRQ_DOMAIN" that "fix" is removing right > now will have to be added again once we will move that code to use > genirq domain support. Please, get a clue and realise that the current code, even with IRQ_DOMAIN set, OOPSes on boot, as I've already reported, and as I've now said several times now. The code is fucked. Therefore code needs fixing.