From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: OMAP34xx Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:47:25 -0800 Message-ID: <20120208054724.GC1426@atomide.com> References: <20120204185453.GB17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120204190109.GL20333@atomide.com> <20120204203453.GD17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <87zkcugus0.fsf@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:16667 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751054Ab2BHFra (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:47:30 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zkcugus0.fsf@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson * Kevin Hilman [120207 13:38]: > Russell King - ARM Linux writes: > > [...] > > > Another problem oopses the kernel at boot in the voltage domain code, > > which I suspect this has never been boot tested on OMAP34xx CPUs: > > > > omap_vc_init_channel: PMIC info requried to configure vc forvdd_core not populated.Hence cannot initialize vc > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 ... > > [] (omap_vp_init+0x0/0x15c) from [] (omap_voltage_late_init+ > > 0xc4/0xfc) ... > > FWIW, this problem has been fixed for some time, and in my > for_3.3/cleanup/pm branch (and included in Tony's cleanup branch) which > was supposed to be merged for v3.3. Yes sorry I guess I did not realize it was a fix. This was one of the three branches that were left out of the last merge window because it was getting too. I assume you're talking about commit af9a2ed9667b49e7e125eac526d8f655183ce53e? Regards, Tony