From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv5yS-0001w2-1J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:46:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv5yM-0000Vv-6c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:46:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15809) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv5yL-0000Vq-Us for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:46:02 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:45:56 -0200 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20120208094556.250626c1@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <4F312854.3080404@redhat.com> References: <73865e0ce364c40e0eb65ec6b22b819d@mail.gmail.com> <4F312854.3080404@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] replication agent module List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: dlaor@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Ori Mamluk On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:34:12 +0100 Kevin Wolf wrote: > The other message types could possibly be implemented as QMP commands. I > guess we might need to attach multiple QMP monitors for this to work > (one for libvirt, one for the rephub). I'm not sure if there is a > fundamental problem with this or if it just needs to be done. Afaik, multiple QMP instances is not well tested. It's something I've tried not to break when adding new functionality, but I don't think it got any serious usage so far.