From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36270) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv5Cj-0003e4-5p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:56:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv5Cd-00074F-6q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:56:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 21:48:40 +1100 From: David Gibson Message-ID: <20120208104840.GG11852@truffala.fritz.box> References: <1328680437-31779-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] PPC64: Add support for ldbrx and stdbrx instructions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: malc Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:54:21AM +0400, malc wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, David Gibson wrote: > > > From: Thomas Huth > > > > These instructions for loading and storing byte-swapped 64-bit values have > > been introduced in PowerISA 2.06. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > > --- > > target-ppc/translate.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > I seem to recall that POWER5 machine i had access to didn't have > ld/stdbrx while CBE did have it (or was it the other way around?) > so question is - is PPC_64B sufficient? Ah, I think it's not. I think I spotted that before, but then forgot about it. Thanks for the reminder. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson