From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: OMAP34xx Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:47:31 -0800 Message-ID: <20120209004731.GA11343@kroah.com> References: <87lioegtk9.fsf@ti.com> <87y5sei1qz.fsf@ti.com> <87k43xfee3.fsf@ti.com> <20120208170653.GA3492@kroah.com> <20120208195327.GA5223@kroah.com> <871uq53p3c.fsf@ti.com> <20120208231551.GA9009@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:61668 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756773Ab2BIArk (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2012 19:47:40 -0500 Received: by pbcun15 with SMTP id un15so1064091pbc.19 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:47:40 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Kevin Hilman , Grazvydas Ignotas , Tony Lindgren , Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 05:14:18PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi Greg > > was just directed at this thread: > > On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Greg KH wrote: > > > Don't send me anything, saying it needs to get into the -rc merge > > window, that you don't actually want to see merged. Otherwise, how long > > am I supposed to know to wait? That's just looney. > > We did want to see it merged. But then we came up with a better fix, > which is why I asked you to revert the original in favor of the new > version: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132760582332651&w=2 > > If we'd realized that the second version would be delayed until 3.4, we > wouldn't have wanted the first version to be reverted :-( You said the first version was broken. Anyway, moving on... > > > The version you have currently queued is needed for v3.3 as they fix > > > brokenness on v3.3. Any chance they can be applied queued for 3.3? > > > We'll have another set of enhancements on top of those that are > > > targetted for v3.4, but those you have queued currently are defintely > > > fixes. > > > > At this point in the release cycle, I would prefer to wait. > > It would be really great if this series could make it in for v3.3-rcX. > Without it, 3.3 will be unusable for any OMAP users that run the console > on the serial port. That's pretty much every OMAP user that runs mainline > kernels, AFAIK. Show me an OMAP user that actually runs a mainline kernel :) What changeset(s) do you want me to take from my tty-next tree and put it in the tty-linus tree to be merged for the 3.3-final timeframe? thanks, greg k-h