From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ey0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxCOB-0006TR-Ck for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:01:23 +0100 Received: by eaal10 with SMTP id l10so1710921eaa.6 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:53:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EaXS+pQJWwnI//TzuyMp1S5hL9Pp/+CgbCBfHpEmjck=; b=IaofqxORxWbisojK87lNUgy38Jd/NRgSHd5eLWU73nmgVMA3mGI4RJ5cw0pHGn7mdY E+kgUdX6uNge3W7M+GbExmNvrIF3+XuhIufCA8OrfkI+evqOjFZxLeoCZPA25imKbsZ4 POQx3VaVAheX8g0xkMVBSTZ3kipz/CIIHZHrc= Received: by 10.14.17.26 with SMTP id i26mr6311814eei.115.1329202393036; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:53:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o49sm70024648eei.0.2012.02.13.22.53.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:53:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:09 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Message-ID: <20120214065309.GA29437@jama.jama.net> References: <4F314A73.8070406@linux.intel.com> <20120207231245.GA13160@sakrah.homelinux.org> <4F31BF7B.4040303@linux.intel.com> <54DBF0D0-65DA-4444-8EF5-3E14ED8FE44F@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120213074852.GA3832@jama.jama.net> <60152733-3093-4B6D-8D98-517DEA75C5A2@dominion.thruhere.net> <857BE142E5399E46B20FD45B9DB8A7BC0FCE7381@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <857BE142E5399E46B20FD45B9DB8A7BC0FCE7381@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/20] zlib: Upgrade 1.2.5 -> 1.2.6 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:01:23 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 17481 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:52:30AM +0000, Lu, Lianhao wrote: > >>>>=20 > >>>> It works if you -c cleansstate on a bunch of recipes, pango, cairo, = fontconfig, gtk+, etc > >>>=20 >=20 > I tried rpm-native after "-c cleansstate", but it still asks for libz.la?= Anyone has the clue? one .la still with libz.la in dependency tree is enough to pollute all =2Ela files even when they get rebuild thanks to PR bump. That's why I sent another wider round of PR bumps to oe-core and also to all layers (oe-core, meta-openembedded/*, meta-smartphone/*) I'm using at o= nce,=20 because ie libsoup-2.4 from meta-efl wasn't PR bumped and was still pulling= =20 libz.la to all .la files depending on libsoup :/. And even my wider PR bump round isn't 100% complete for everybody, because it's based on sysroot popultated by my builds and you can have different .la files there (from different recipe versions or different layers). Cheers, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk86BNUACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBzJXgCfeYDugvhp7TVkMePeclB+6+SF Wv0An18atvsuxyJKQ/2uN/jraG5Pkz/3 =zXuI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--