From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:56755 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751541Ab2B0MBh (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:01:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:01:36 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Fu Liankun Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: spnfs write performance issue Message-ID: <20120227120136.GA21384@fieldses.org> References: <4F44C071.8010104@cn.fujitsu.com> <20120222172510.GA12708@fieldses.org> <4F4B224C.8030101@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <4F4B224C.8030101@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:27:24PM +0800, Fu Liankun wrote: > J. Bruce Fields 写道: > >On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:16:17PM +0800, Fu Liankun wrote: > >>When copy a big file(about 500MB) to nfs server using pnfs, it cost > >>obvious longer time as compared with NFSv3 or NFSv4 protocol. > >> > >>PNFS cost about 300-550s > >>NFSv3 cost about 49s > >>NFSv4 cost about 49s > >> > >>My test environment as following: > >> > >>MDS: 3.1.0-rc8-pnfs ipaddr1: 192.168.0.100, ipaddr2:192.168.1.100 > >>DS1: 3.1.0-rc8-pnfs ipaddr1: 192.168.0.101, ipaddr2:192.168.1.101 > >>DS2: 3.1.0-rc8-pnfs ipaddr1: 192.168.0.102, ipaddr2:192.168.1.102 > >>client: RHEL6.2GA(2.6.32-220.el6.i686) ipaddr1: 192.168.0.19, > > > >What kind of server are you using? > > Sorry for late response. > > Fedora14 + 3.1.0-rc8-pnfs And you're exporting gfs2? --b. > > --b > > > > >--b. > > > >>ipaddr2:192.168.1.19 > >> > >>192.168.1.100 <-------- NFS4.1 connection --------->192.168.1.101 > >>192.168.0.100 <-------- NFS4.1 connection --------->192.168.0.102 > >>192.168.0.19 <-------- NFS4.1 connection --------->192.168.0.100 > >> > >>Dunring the write process, the client output the message: > >>FS-Cache: Loaded > >>FS-Cache: Netfs 'nfs' registered for caching > >>nfs4filelayout_init: NFSv4 File Layout Driver Registering... > >>nfs: server 192.168.1.101 not responding, timed out > >> > >>The message "nfs: server 192.168.1.101 not responding, timed out" was > >>output during the COMMIT request. > >> > >>Who can tell me the reason why pnfs cost so long time. > >> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > >>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >-- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > >