From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932795Ab2CADBn (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:01:43 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35597 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932442Ab2CADBj (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:01:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:01:25 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree Message-ID: <20120301030125.GA27070@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park References: <20120301135601.a164a12e2bd4aee871ff60db@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120301135601.a164a12e2bd4aee871ff60db@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:56:01PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Dave, > > After merging the cpufreq tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_init': > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:880:28: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function) > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_exit': > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:896:25: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function) > > Caused by commit 500e8ca39c56 ("[CPUFREQ] ondemand: handle QoS request on > DVFS response latency"). > > I have used the cpufreq tree fomr next-20120229 for today. gah, this patch was dependant upon another that didn't apply cleanly. Dave