On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:26:25PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 04.03.2012 12:12, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:52:50PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 02.03.2012 17:49, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:39:15PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>>> Am 01.03.2012 12:27, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso:
> >>>>> While merging ipt_LOG and ip6t_LOG, you introduced some bug that
> >>>>> corrupts the log line. Note the extra PROTO=, I don't have any UDPLITE
> >>>>> traffic here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Looks like a missing break in one switch.
> >>>>
> >>>> I got confused by my own logic. :-\
> >>>> Does the attached patch fix the issue?
> >>>> It's based on "Netfilter: xt_LOG: Add timestamp support"
> >>>
> >>> This patch lacks of description. If you don't make it myself, I have
> >>> to do it for you :-(
> >>>
> >>> Please, send me patches following the standard format next time.
> >>
> >> It was a "does this patch solve the problem"-Patch.
> >> Does it fix the problem?
> >>
> >> If so, I'll send an official one...
> > 
> > Sorry, that's too much overhead. I don't mind testing it, but I want
> > to apply it as soon as it fixes the problem ;-)
> > 
> 
> I'll try to reproduce your problem and test the fix for my own.

Here it works fine, but double test it fine, thanks.

Here's the patch, I added the description.