From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: crash in is_xen_swiotlb_buffer Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:57:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20120313165738.GI19228@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20120312163221.GA10987@eire.uk.xensource.com> <20120313142617.GA21587@eire.uk.xensource.com> <20120313155842.GA24715@eire.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120313155842.GA24715@eire.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Goncalo Gomes Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:58:42PM +0000, Goncalo Gomes wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Goncalo Gomes wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 12, 2012 12:28 PM, "Goncalo Gomes" > wrote: > > > > > > > > I've compiled unstable c/s: 5d20d2f6ffed and linux 3.2.9 but I've been > > > > > > Do you get similar issues with Xen 4.1? > > > > Can't say I tried it, but I can give it a spin. Any specific tag? > > As I cloned unstable from a local dir into a different dir in the > server to checkout 4.1.0, the server crashed again, which leads me to > think minimal dom0 stress may be just enough to reproduce it in my > environment. I'll be doing some more testing to see if I can find out > what it takes. > > In any case, I've done some minimal testing with 4.1.0-branch, such as > having 10 instances of update-grub running in parallel, a find / -ls, > etc. > > 4.1.0 seems to handle it well, AFAICT. OK. So xen-unstable looks to have a bug somewhere. > > Goncalo > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel