From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DBAE0059A for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2QHIJdk014221 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wrlaptop (172.25.40.226) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:18:19 -0700 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:18:16 -0500 From: Peter Seebach To: Richard Purdie Message-ID: <20120326121816.343a5f01@wrlaptop> In-Reply-To: <1332780449.28414.122.camel@ted> References: <2046170.9fCjTlmZqN@helios> <1332472886.1765.1.camel@dongxiao-osel> <20120323021635.5b4fc048@wrlaptop> <1537192.Q99X1xdoal@helios> <20120323174506.5634af61@wrlaptop> <1332609315.28414.19.camel@ted> <1332610903.28414.24.camel@ted> <20120326114405.59b3eacc@wrlaptop> <1332780449.28414.122.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Paul Eggleton , yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: pseudo interaction issue X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:18:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:47:29 +0100 Richard Purdie wrote: > This is pretty much what we do at the moment, it gets unset after we > load. Pseudo is of course disabled at this point. > > I guess we just got lucky to this point and avoided "Bad Things"? I suspect so. What's weird to me is that PSEUDO_PREFIX wasn't in the environment before, either. So I still don't quite get this. I am still missing something which will make this all make sense. ... at this point, I am leaning towards viewing this as a bug where it is not enough to simply correct the behavior, I will not feel confident in it until I have understood how it could have happened, but worked in many other cases. -s -- Listen, get this. Nobody with a good compiler needs to be justified.