From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] fsnotify: change locking order
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:51:22 +0200
Message-ID: <20120326225122.GA3296@Neptun>
References: <1308065393-29463-1-git-send-email-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
 <4E370EBE.3050100@redhat.com>
 <20110811231331.GB5735@uranus.sol>
 <87fwd3glak.fsf@camandro.org>
 <1332269899.3178.3.camel@localhost>
 <87ty1bli0o.fsf@camandro.org>
 <1332774776.3290.10.camel@localhost>
 <20120326152742.GA3124@zeus>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: eparis@redhat.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:42826 "HELO
	mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with SMTP id S1752408Ab2CZWv0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:51:26 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120326152742.GA3124@zeus>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:27:42PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> 
> No problem, and thank you for the update.  I guess this is the sort of
> patches that actually requires a good amount of testing on -next, so
> it makes sense to wait for next window.
> 

I totally agree. Better to have this in linux-next for a while and make
sure that no nasty side effects have been introduced.