From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix regulator related build fail in magician_defconfig Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:18:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20120328101852.GE3232@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1331084814.11802.YahooMailClassic@web29012.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1331242494-3157-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <4F608F4F.8020106@windriver.com> <20120314123236.GE3133@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120328094351.GB22414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY" Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:33118 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757656Ab2C1KTS (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:19:18 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120328094351.GB22414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Paul Gortmaker , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Haojian Zhuang , lost.distance@yahoo.com --ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:43:51AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:32:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Yes, that's what you should do. Calling dev_name() is only possible if > > you have the struct device and removing the need for the struct device > > is exactly what we're trying to avoid here. > So what the hell is happening here to fix the breakage which the > regulator tree caused in mainline? From this thread, it looks like > it's been known about since 8th March which is now twenty days ago, > and it's still broken. Yes, please at least apply Paul's patches - honestly, given how old these boards are and the general lack of activity I'd rather expect that the only thing anyone's doing with them these days is build tests. --ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPcuVAAAoJEBus8iNuMP3dl60QAI2ubNFAOyJJlMOnuqNfs/7J XKs4D7C5oJXpYlVIl7dUCoVYoPPgJSw9uI0+gciGv4Q3JVihryBw0WvGnsVkU7kk GqrUa+RG5gF14z5oF+W21YkwR+I0nCYoHAlDSDssRzHWJWVmi3C9BrFP0+sLVtg1 HXr9uKff/0BMVLtC8sqGVQin4NgccO2gvA8PkzpF82KZ381xDcm8MkI34R9opg+3 y53BGXhE6wBRoaoVWHzFIX+U3QIasSorxXJ8xFldHw+XGGZrzcs4B4WvzRJLWXpE sILTYoJRIEBOQd9WTS794TcU0bUFJZiso8Zddlq5FNha9lcgP++cvc4QrycnuNY+ 2aAxgCs5rTIqeDCAibWgmf1+QjEWla0/aWXhJUbO38d7azquJzB0sAsnj5MzAdd2 hsUFJrwZ/6CwE0bFnJH4VHgJQEqU3Sfj86neScN4527pd3Qmhs2gQm0dM0SbRbPk rtmcwXpqe4a1WQbGpo6jg8Pcf8sm3pscOz3cBN3F6ipe8FjyWt2LRrO6XIUzXbMx wBQoJTZ+wzUNofjFpPOToPPbkPzLJ+y7vBnthTjg9gPgTz4K5cwDqmbfQAeufynI fJPdmzLq5c+Tdscx8kF/gUq/9yCGhg83uDIReIHjyjCMGLYykzQXtWrDUYVuQGA0 KgPsbymeizu/Oy/1aIVp =N0iS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:18:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix regulator related build fail in magician_defconfig In-Reply-To: <20120328094351.GB22414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1331084814.11802.YahooMailClassic@web29012.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1331242494-3157-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <4F608F4F.8020106@windriver.com> <20120314123236.GE3133@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120328094351.GB22414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20120328101852.GE3232@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:43:51AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:32:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Yes, that's what you should do. Calling dev_name() is only possible if > > you have the struct device and removing the need for the struct device > > is exactly what we're trying to avoid here. > So what the hell is happening here to fix the breakage which the > regulator tree caused in mainline? From this thread, it looks like > it's been known about since 8th March which is now twenty days ago, > and it's still broken. Yes, please at least apply Paul's patches - honestly, given how old these boards are and the general lack of activity I'd rather expect that the only thing anyone's doing with them these days is build tests. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: