From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932229Ab2C1P3H (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:29:07 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:47024 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756518Ab2C1P3F (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:29:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:28:59 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: MyungJoo Ham , LKML , NeilBrown , Randy Dunlap , Mike Lockwood , Arve =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hj=F8nnevag?= , Kyungmin Park , Linus Walleij , Dmitry Torokhov , Morten CHRISTIANSEN , Mark Brown , John Stultz , Joerg Roedel , cw00.choi@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] Introduce External Connector Class (extcon) Message-ID: <20120328152859.GA21001@kroah.com> References: <1332492784-10526-1-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> <20120328144450.GA19030@kroah.com> <201203281524.08021.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201203281524.08021.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:24:07PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 28 March 2012, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 06:39:08PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > > > Dear Arnd, > > > > > > Could you please consider the EXTCON patchset for the current merge window? > > > > Wait, no, the current merge window for new stuff closed a week or so > > before 3.3 came out. This needs to be in linux-next before the merge > > window opens to ensure that things work properly there before it can be > > accepted into the mainline tree. > > > > So this could go into 3.5 at the earliest. > > Right. I'm also not convinced that arm-soc is the right place for this to > go, and I had not planned to add the patches there. Unfortunately I also > haven't followed the last few versions and will have to do at least one > more review round and Ack/Nak the interfaces. I should probably do that > once -rc1 is out, so please send me a reminder if you don't hear back from > me in time. > > Any opinions on which tree this should go through? I could take it into > arm-soc, but it's not really ARM-only. Maybe having it go through the > staging tree would be better, leaving MyungJoo in charge afterwards. > I guess we should also add a MAINTAINERS entry for the new subsystem. If acks come through, and I'll be glad to review it after -rc1 as well, I can take it through one of my trees to get merged to Linus for 3.5. thanks, greg k-h