All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@frijolero.org>
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: Clarify GPL-Compatible is OK
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:27:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120407002723.GA14568@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1333757482-16204-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@frijolero.org>

On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 05:11:22PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@frijolero.org>
> 
> While the kernel is GPLv2 individual files and modules have
> historically been allowed to be:
> 
>   * Dual BSD/GPL
>   * Dual MIT/GPL
>   * Dual MPL/GPL
> 
> This is done for several reasons but most importantly to be able to
> share between Linux and permissive licensed Operating Systems such
> as the BSDs.
> 
> You do not need to make dual licenses when licenses are compatible
> with each other, and in fact at times this can confuse developers / legal.
> This has been well documented by SFLC through their "Maintaining
> Permissive-Licensed Files in a GPL-Licensed Project: Guidelines for
> Developers" [0] which was inspired by the ambiguity of the MadWifi
> Project's Dual BSD/GPL license tradition. The list of GPL-Compatible
> licenses can be found on the FSF's website [1].
> 
> Lets help move out of the stone age and instead of extending this list
> with more permissive licenses add a simple "GPL-Compatible" tag for use by
> any GPL-Compatible licensed module. Given that vendors tend to grep existing
> drivers for what they do also change all drivers to use the simple tag but
> leave in place the old checks in case external drivers are using this. Moving
> forward GPL-Compatible modules should rely on this simple new tag instead
> of using the old tags or looking to add a new GPL-Compatible text descring
> that license.
> 
> [0] http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/gpl-non-gpl-collaboration.html
> [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
> 
> Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@frijolero.org>


Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-07  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-07  0:11 [PATCH] module: Clarify GPL-Compatible is OK Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-07  0:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2012-04-07  0:28 ` Al Viro
2012-04-07  0:57   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-07  0:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-07  0:51   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-07  1:02     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-08 12:42       ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-07  2:49     ` Ted Ts'o
2012-04-07  3:01       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-07 21:15         ` Ted Ts'o
2012-04-08  0:52           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-08 14:57             ` Alan Cox
2012-04-08 16:06               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-08 17:12                 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-08 20:23             ` Ted Ts'o
2012-04-07 19:03 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-08 12:49   ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-08 22:50 ` Dan Williams
2012-05-07  2:39 ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120407002723.GA14568@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=keithp@keithp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@frijolero.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.