From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next #2 28/39] natsemi: stop using net_device.{base_addr, irq}. Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:02:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120410.200212.1031414009653598743.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20120410.193042.1153959183942458232.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: romieu@fr.zoreil.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: thockin@hockin.org Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:49198 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932451Ab2DKADS (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:03:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Tim Hockin Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:39:31 -0700 > OK, so that addresses that concern. :) Thanks. > > Overall nothing in the CL stands out as bad, except for the IO vs MMIO > BAR thing, which I can not answer with certainty any more. If you capacity to review patches to the driver for anything other than trivial changes is close to zero, which it appears to be, you might consider whether you should be listed in MAINTAINERS for it any long. And also, therefore, whether this driver should be marked as Maintained.