From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: [v2] Re: [RFC] l2tp/ipv6: support for L2TPv2 over UDP over IPv6 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:49:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20120410184916.GE24092@kvack.org> References: <20120214223112.GB6806@kvack.org> <1329282410.2555.31.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4F3B6C26.4090701@katalix.com> <4F632FB6.9010206@katalix.com> <20120319032807.GD11293@kvack.org> <4F840FCB.9050504@katalix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: James Chapman Return-path: Received: from kanga.kvack.org ([205.233.56.17]:45711 "EHLO kanga.kvack.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754043Ab2DJStR (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:49:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F840FCB.9050504@katalix.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:47:39AM +0100, James Chapman wrote: > We've tested this in several L2TP environments - looks good. Will you be > submitting a version soon? Yes. I'll try to get that out tonight now that net-next is open again. Also, I found a bug in OpenL2TPd (1.8 I think): certain types of AVPs are not accepted if they are hidden, despite the fact that RFC 2661 permits hiding these AVPs. The AVPs in question are: Assigned Tunnel ID, Challege, Challenge Response and Assigned Session ID. -ben -- "Thought is the essence of where you are now."