From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933248Ab2DKUxk (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:53:40 -0400
Received: from smtp.snhosting.dk ([87.238.248.203]:58667 "EHLO
	smtp.domainteam.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1760165Ab2DKUxj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:53:39 -0400
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:53:37 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: drop obsolete ARCH_BOOTMEM support
Message-ID: <20120411205337.GA29238@merkur.ravnborg.org>
References: <20120406124735.GA6920@merkur.ravnborg.org> <20120411163016.GC12887@google.com> <CAE9FiQVmyTSUGKmusrVvj-38URhRFzvjv7w-2ch928kEiJPOhg@mail.gmail.com> <20120411171115.GE12887@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120411171115.GE12887@google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:11:15AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:03:50AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 02:47:35PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >> From ae6cdc767f973f39cb205af4b80ff13f35a1b66e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > >> From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> > >> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:37:08 +0200
> > >> Subject: [PATCH] x86: drop obsolete ARCH_BOOTMEM support
> > >>
> > >> x86 unconditionally uses NO_BOOTMEM so there is no use
> > >> of the HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM support as mm/bootmem.c is the
> > >> only file referencing this symbol.
> > >>
> > >> bootmem_arch_preferred_node() is the function referred
> > >> in the mm/bootmem.c code and can thuis be dropped too.
> > >>
> > >> x86 was the sole user of HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM - so there is
> > >> an opportunity to clean up a little in mm/bootmem.c too
> > >> if we do not expect other users to emerge.
> > >
> > > avr32 seems to have it too?
> > 
> > avr32 is:
> > 
> > config HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM
> >         def_bool n
> > 
> > so that is not used with avr32
> 
> Yeah, then better remove the reference from there too, right?
Yep - will do tomorrow.

	Sam