From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:26:55 +0000 Subject: Re: Question about hibernation on sparc64 Message-Id: <20120412192655.GC30472@merkur.ravnborg.org> List-Id: References: <80041334231315@web149.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <80041334231315@web149.yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 07:59:57PM +0100, Alex Buell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 12:32 -0400, David Miller wrote: > > From: Kirill Tkhai > > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:48:35 +0400 > >=20 > > > So I want to ask people who know sparc64 deeply. Are there any > > > architecture limits which make hibernation on v9 impossible? May be > > > anybody has researched this question. > >=20 > > I can't think of any sparc64 hardware which would support hibernation > > in any reasonable way, so I'm quite surprised that you plan on > > implementing support for it. Perhaps you can elaborate your plans :-) >=20 > http://www.rugged-systems.com/p/mobilesunsolaris/0075.htm is a sparc64 > laptop :) I'm actually tempeted by this: http://www.ebay.de/itm/Tadpole-SparcBook-s3-GX-32-mb-no-HD-or-Battery-3GX-f= ree-shipping-/390406182711?pt=DE_Technik_Computer_Peripherieger%C3%A4te_PC_= Systeme&hash=3Ditem5ae6059737#ht_3226wt_1064 But I could also wait until someone donate me a not-so-power hungry sparc64= box. Sam