* Thierry Reding wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 April 2012, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >   * Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 10 April 2012, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > I'm taking over the maintainership of the PWM subsystem. This commit
> > > > > also adds the URLs to the gitorious project and repository as well as
> > > > > any missing files related to the PWM subsystem.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-RM9K5IK7kjKj5M59NBduVrNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Note: I guess this patch in particular could use some Acked-by, maybe from
> > > > > Arnd and Sascha so that people will know this happens with their blessing.
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
> > > 
> > > As far as I can tell the series is in pretty good shape. I've integrated
> > > Shawn's latest comments and I think we could get this into 3.5. Does it make
> > > sense to take the PWM tree through Linux next before having it pulled into
> > > mainline during the next merge window?
> > 
> > Yes, that's the way to go. Just ask Stephen Rothwell to include it right
> > away if you are sufficiently happy with the contents and believe that they
> > don't break stuff.
> 
> I just saw that there's been some discussion to remove IS_ENABLED() and
> replace it by something else. So maybe I should wait another day or two
> until those changes settle in next.

Seems like this issue is resolved, but something else came up. In the !OF
builds, of_pwm_request() no longer builds because of_property_match_string()
and of_parse_phandle_with_args() have no dummies for !OF. I've posted patches
for these on Friday and they need to go in before the PWM subsystem. I could
also revert the IS_ENABLED() parts and go back to a #ifdef CONFIG_OF but I'd
rather not.

Thierry