From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q3H4D3xS014388 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:13:03 -0500 Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9NTvbJmbNn7EWVkc for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:12:58 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/18] xfs: current patch queue Message-ID: <20120417041258.GF6734@dastard> References: <1334319061-12968-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20120416212911.GE2924@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120416212911.GE2924@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:29:11PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > Dave, > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:10:43PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Here's a repost of my current patch queue. They are all based on Christoph's > > ilock and xfsbufd patch series and been tested on top of them. I've updated all > > the reviewed-by tags, so if the patch is missing such a tag then it hasn't been > > reviewed.... > > Looks like Christoph has some work to do on patch 4 of his xfsbufd series. Do > you want to rebase to something without that patch? It's a bit of a PITA to do because of all the overlap with Christoph's patch set. I'll spend the afternoon trying to work out what is wrong with Christoph's code, because I think we really need to get rid of the xfsbufd before I start making the buffer code more complex again... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs