Re: [PATCH v2] completion: add new git_complete helper

From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder@ira.uka.de>,
	"Thomas Rast" <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] completion: add new git_complete helper
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:36:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120417073653.GB20017@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s3OSepH_XpCcTWLN=bF0+P9fmHtyPnWdQnEocW25jHTpA@mail.gmail.com>

Felipe Contreras wrote:

> You are the one who brought the argument that even public functions
> have the '_' prefix, so it's *your* responsibility to substantiate
> that argument.

No, honestly it isn't my responsibility to waste time arguing with
you.  What kind of crazy world would work that way?

And I did not mean to bring up any argument.  I only meant to bring up
the _datum_ that, at least in the context of the bash_completion
project, that is the current convention.  And then you started trying
to tell me that I had the facts wrong!  You might even be right, but
you haven't shown any sign of trying to check that, by, say, asking
someone from the bash_completion project what convention they use.

I'm sick of this.  Call it whatever you want.  I don't know why you
think this is productive.

Still annoyed,
Jonathan