From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:34:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201204171434.06178.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 17 April 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote: > SPEAr now supports common clock framework. This patchset contains changes > related to this. It also contain few dependency commits for clock framework that > are earlier sent separately. > > @Mike: It would be easiest to get these through ARM-SoC tree. So, would need > your Acked-by on these patches. But firstly they must get reivewed :) We should agree on how we want to do the common clk patches for v3.5. The two options I see are either we take all the patches that Mike Acks into arm-soc, or Mike applies the patches in his own tree and submits them to arm-soc. I think either way is fine for me, but some people might feel strongly one way or another. > MAINTAINERS | 4 +- > arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/clock.c | 1354 +++++++++-------------- > arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/include/mach/generic.h | 4 +- > arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/include/mach/misc_regs.h | 2 + > arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/include/mach/spear.h | 13 + > arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear300.c | 1 - > arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear310.c | 1 - > arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear320.c | 12 +- > arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear3xx.c | 2 + > arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/clock.c | 1015 +++++------------ > arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/include/mach/misc_regs.h | 2 + > arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/spear6xx.c | 5 +- > arch/arm/plat-spear/Makefile | 3 +- > arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-aux-synth.c | 195 ++++ > arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-frac-synth.c | 156 +++ > arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-gpt-synth.c | 145 +++ > arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-vco-pll.c | 346 ++++++ > arch/arm/plat-spear/clock.c | 1005 ----------------- I wonder: should the clock drivers remain part of the platform directory, or get moved into a subdirectory of drivers/clk? I was assuming that we'd do the latter, but I haven't been following the clk discussions that closely. Arnd