From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Buchacher Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] git-cherry-pick: Add test to validate new options Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:34:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20120418183418.GA23447@ecki> References: <1334342707-3326-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <1334342707-3326-4-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <20120415093933.GB6263@ecki> <20120416161431.GD13366@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <7vvckzws73.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120416165024.GF13366@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20120416214247.GA5606@ecki> <20120417105604.GB11462@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20120417213851.GA20082@ecki> <20120418104859.GB22172@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Phil Hord To: Neil Horman X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 18 20:54:20 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKa1B-00039m-Bg for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:54:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754148Ab2DRSyN (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:54:13 -0400 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at ([213.33.87.14]:12223 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753833Ab2DRSyM (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:54:12 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p5B22CC82.dip.t-dialin.net [91.34.204.130]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1247210028; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:50:08 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120418104859.GB22172@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 06:48:59AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > Given that we agree on our ability to consistently not use master > above, what if we table this discussion for now, leave the tests as > they are, and fix them all up in a separate patch set? Does that sound > reasonable? Absolutely.