From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:57:19 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201204190857.19770.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 18 April 2012, Turquette, Mike wrote: > I've taken patches 02 - 06 into my -next branch. Patch 01 isn't for > me really, and I've not yet tested patch 07 (I'll take it everything > looks good). The rest of your series (08 - 13) should probably go > through Arnd. My preference would be to have the whole series go through your tree and move the implementation of the spear clock code to drivers/clk in the process. This will reduce interdependencies between the spear clock branch and other branches that have spear patches. I also think it's a good idea if you submit the clk patches to Linus directly for the next merge window, but it's ok to use arm-soc if that makes you feel more confident about it. Arnd