From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from services.gcu-squad.org (zoneX.GCU-Squad.org [194.213.125.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA20B6FED for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:04:03 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:37:23 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] PowerMac i2c API conversions & windfarm updates Message-ID: <20120419113723.03a24d46@endymion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <1334823416-9138-1-git-send-email-benh@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1334823416-9138-1-git-send-email-benh@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Christian Kujau , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:16:41 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > The goal of this series is to convert a bulk of PowerMac i2c drivers > to the new "proper" i2c driver registration model. This series is > not complete in that there are still a few drivers to do but it > goes through the bulk of thermal control and some of the nastiest. > > The biggest change is that windfarm is ported to generally use > the new model, and I've written a new set of windfarm modules to > take over from the old therm_pm72 (which was mostly unfixable) > on the PowerMac G5 AGP and Xserve G5 machines. > > This had a bit of testing on a couple of PowerMac G5 AGP variants > but none at all on Xserve G5 since the one I have is unfortunately > dead. > > If you want to help me test this, don't forget to disable therm_pm72, > and instead load windfarm_pm72 or windfarm_rm31 depending on your > machine (you can load or build-in the whole lot as well). As usual > windfarm don't properly auto-load yet, I still need to fix that. > > So please test ! Especially if you have an XServe G5 Benjamin, thanks a lot for doing this! These drivers were the last ones blocking the removal of the legacy binding model in i2c-core. Testers are very welcome. The earliest we can get these changes upstream, the better. Christian, can you please test this series? I'm sure Benjamin can send the patches to you directly if needed. -- Jean Delvare