From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 03:40:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] MXS: Add platform registration hooks for USB EHCI
In-Reply-To: <20120420013442.GG22219@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
References: <1334714869-19282-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>
 <201204200256.51011.marex@denx.de>
 <20120420013442.GG22219@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Message-ID: <201204200340.40567.marex@denx.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Dear Shawn Guo,

> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:56:50AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Shawn Guo,
> > 
> > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:32:56PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > The Device Tree code for MXS is not ripe yet. We still miss a lot in
> > > > there. Flipping this usb stuff to DT should be easy, I see no point
> > > > disallowing this (and that stands also for the MXS SPI actually) into
> > > > kernel so more people can test it only because you'd like this to
> > > > wait for who knows how long for the DT support to arrive. Don't take
> > > > it personally, but I still believe it's too early to enforce DT on
> > > > MXS.
> > > 
> > > Let me put it another way.  When you have drivers/usb changes hit
> > > mainline, while there is still something not ripe for mxs DT support
> > > while stops you adding DT support for usb driver, you have good reason
> > > to ask me take the arch/arm/mach-mxs changes in this series then.
> > 
> > Yes, I'm quite aware this stuff might take a bit to get into mainline
> > shape. I grouped this and MXS SPI together, maybe the MXS SPI stuff is a
> > better representation of what I had in mind (about letting non-DT stuff
> > for mxs slide in).
> 
> I gave Fabio the same comment on his SPI patch.

Well, let's see how it turns out, I have some questions for Sascha and after I 
sort these out, I'll send V4 of these

Best regards,
Marek Vasut