From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49B2E0140A for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 06:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.178.225.66]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M2S00DQZ52RYOE1@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:20:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 995EB201A7; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:20:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:20:50 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Steffen Sledz Message-id: <20120420132050.GA3783@denix.org> References: <4F910E4F.9000800@dresearch-fe.de> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <4F910E4F.9000800@dresearch-fe.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org, Denys Dmytriyenko Subject: Re: meta-ti layer confusion X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:20:53 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:20:47AM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote: > Our company is working on a new TI DM814x based hardware currently. > > That's a really hard job, because the TI linux support is not really "optimal". But that's not the primary cause for my message. > > [1] lists two TI BSP layers [2],[3] each one claiming to be "The official OpenEmbedded/Yocto BSP layer for Texas Instruments platforms.". > > A look into them shows that they are not identically. At the moment they differ in two commits ([3] is ahead of [2]). In the last days these differences where much bigger. > > So what is the intention for these two "offical" layers? > > Which one should we use? And why? > > BTW: Is anyone else out there working on a TI DM814x/DM816x hardware? > > Regards, > Steffen > > [1] > [2] > [3] They are the same. Or more appropriately, there is just one official meta-ti layer, it's just mirrored in several places. The one on yoctoproject.org[2] is considered the official mirror and that's what you should use. If you are subscribed to this list, you should have seen Koen posting 2 patches for review yesterday, which he has staged to his working copy on github[3] - that's the difference in 2 commits. They shouldn't have been pushed to the master branch though, until they are accepted... -- Denys