From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD)
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:43:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] arm: at91: fix build-error for board-dt
In-Reply-To: <20120421140903.GA6926@pengutronix.de>
References: <1335004105-3162-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de>
 <20120421114001.GC9142@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <20120421140903.GA6926@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <20120421144304.GD9142@game.jcrosoft.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 16:09 Sat 21 Apr     , Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 01:40:01PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 12:28 Sat 21 Apr     , Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > From: Wolfram Sang <wolfram@the-dreams.de>
> > > 
> > > When build-testing i2c-patches, I encountered:
> > > 
> > > arch/arm/mach-at91/built-in.o:(.arch.info.init+0x34): undefined reference to `at91sam926x_timer'
> > > 
> > > (using allnoconfig and roughly only MACH_AT91SAM_DT enabled)
> > > 
> > > Since this boardfile doesn't belong to a specific architecture, directly
> > > add the only supported timer to compilation.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wolfram@the-dreams.de>
> > no this is selected by the soc
> > 
> > I do not want the timer be compiled un condtionally
> 
> Ok, we can discard this patch and see it as a bug report.
> Since you know best what you'd like, would you send a patch?
I'll fix on 3.5 by make it depends on AT91SAM9

Best Regards,
J.