From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71)
	id 1SMq59-0000bO-F0
	for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:27:43 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33828)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>) id 1SMq56-0000bG-QM
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:27:41 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>) id 1SMq54-0006bo-PU
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:27:40 -0400
Received: from solo.fdn.fr ([80.67.169.19]:49507)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>) id 1SMq54-0006be-JI
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:27:38 -0400
Received: from type.ipv6 (youpi.is-a-geek.org [80.67.176.89])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by solo.fdn.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 209A244040
	for <grub-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:27:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from samy by type.ipv6 with local (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>) id 1SMq52-0001m1-8H
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:27:36 +0200
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:27:36 +0200
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
To: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH,HURD] Fix grub-probe with userland partition support
Message-ID: <20120425002736.GB29782@type.famille.thibault.fr>
References: <20120424091915.GD4453@type.bordeaux.inria.fr>
	<4F967895.3010203@gmail.com>
	<20120424124220.GS4453@type.bordeaux.inria.fr>
	<4F96A85D.3040303@gmail.com>
	<20120424171358.GT4433@type.famille.thibault.fr>
	<4F9709A9.6090707@gmail.com>
	<20120424222110.GD29782@type.famille.thibault.fr>
	<4F9729BE.1060105@gmail.com>
	<20120424235202.GX29782@type.famille.thibault.fr>
	<4F973E02.9020700@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F973E02.9020700@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)
X-Received-From: 80.67.169.19
X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:27:42 -0000

Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Wed 25 Apr 2012 01:57:54 +=
0200, a =C3=A9crit :
> On 25.04.2012 01:52, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > +    grub_util_error (_("Could not open path `%s'"), path);
> This one should be unified with other similar messages.

Err, in the file I can see various ways: "Unable to", "cannot", "failed
to", "couldn't", "can't".  Which one should be used.

> It would also have advantage of giving strerror.

Oops, indeed.

Samuel