From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] Use common macro to define resources Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:35:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20120425113521.GW24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1335327163-11794-1-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org> <201204250938.58397.heiko@sntech.de> <20120425101007.GM9142@game.jcrosoft.org> <201204251121.47358.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:49060 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758825Ab2DYLfh (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:35:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201204251121.47358.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Heiko =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= , Tushar Behera , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, patches@linaro.org On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:21:47AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Note that the point of the DEFINE_RES_*() macros is really to prevent > people from coming up with new silly macros to do the same thing, as > we've had in the past. One of the other reaons was to stop the stream of resources with wrong endings (because people kept thinking it was exclusive rather than inclusive) - and the resulting stream of additional patches to fix those errors. The legacy platforms do have those kinds of errors - when I converted SA11x0 as part of a previous patch set, I found a number suffering from this error. (Were any found in this patch set? I've not read through it.) I think if this becomes a small %age of the change to Samsung stuff, and Kukjin is happy with it, it should go in. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:35:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 00/33] Use common macro to define resources In-Reply-To: <201204251121.47358.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1335327163-11794-1-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org> <201204250938.58397.heiko@sntech.de> <20120425101007.GM9142@game.jcrosoft.org> <201204251121.47358.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20120425113521.GW24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:21:47AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Note that the point of the DEFINE_RES_*() macros is really to prevent > people from coming up with new silly macros to do the same thing, as > we've had in the past. One of the other reaons was to stop the stream of resources with wrong endings (because people kept thinking it was exclusive rather than inclusive) - and the resulting stream of additional patches to fix those errors. The legacy platforms do have those kinds of errors - when I converted SA11x0 as part of a previous patch set, I found a number suffering from this error. (Were any found in this patch set? I've not read through it.) I think if this becomes a small %age of the change to Samsung stuff, and Kukjin is happy with it, it should go in.