Hi, On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:32:56PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/26/2012 02:26 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 01:55:13PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 04/25/2012 05:07 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote: > >>> Add extern func, "tegra_ahb_enable_smmu()" to inform AHB that SMMU is > >>> ready. > >> > >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC > >>> +static int __tegra_ahb_enable_smmu(struct device *dev, void *data) > >> ... > >>> +int tegra_ahb_enable_smmu(void) > >>> +{ > >>> + return driver_for_each_device(&tegra_ahb_driver.driver, NULL, NULL, > >>> + __tegra_ahb_enable_smmu); > >>> +} > >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tegra_ahb_enable_smmu); > >>> +#endif > >> > >> That looks like a neat solution to avoid having a global device object. > > > > except that it won't work always. If you happen to have two AHB bridges, > > each using a separate smmu but only one smmu is ready, this will set > > SMMU_INIT_DONE on both bridges. > > There is only 1. that's why there's a "if you happen to have" statement. If you stick to this "there is only 1" argument, why do you even make this into a platform driver ? Just stick the entire code hidden on the machine_init() code. Drivers a supposed to be able to instantiated multiple times and always work, this method won't work if tegra99999 ends up with two AHB bridges/SMMUs > >> However, if that driver_for_each_device finds no devices, the function > >> still succeeds. That doesn't seem right, and doesn't allow e.g. the SMMU > >> to defer its probe until the AHB driver has completed. > >> > >> Perhaps add a local int variable to tegra_ahb_enable_smmu(), pass the > >> address to __tegra_ahb_enable_smmu, and have it increment the int. Then, > >> after calling driver_for_each_device,: > >> > >> if (!ahb_device_count) > >> return -EPROBE_DEFER > >> if (WARN_ON(ahb_device_count != 1)) > >> return -EINVAL; > >> return 0; > > > > that would look, well, weird. Why don't you just different initcall > > leves for this ? Maybe smmu goes into postcore_initcall() and tegra_ahb > > goes into postcore_initcall_sync() ?? then you know that SMMU will be > > ready by the time you call tegra_ahb probe. Well, unless smmu's probe > > fail, but then again, IIUC it won't work anyway... > > Uggh. I'd rather all these devices just got instantiated from device > tree and relied on deferred probe to manage any ordering, rather than > playing complex games with multiple initcall levels (and in the end > probably having to invent more and more initcall levels to correctly > represent all the dependencies). then do that... it'll be better than current trickery with driver_for_each_device() and my initcall trickery ;-) -- balbi