From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/24] drm/i915: add LPT PCH checks
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:06:36 -0700
Message-ID: <20120430170636.56a16bb9@jbarnes-desktop>
References: <1335464479-648-1-git-send-email-eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
	<1335464479-648-13-git-send-email-eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com
	[67.222.54.6])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 009869EB4E
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1335464479-648-13-git-send-email-eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:21:07 -0300
Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com> wrote:

> Avoid bogus asserts on Lynx Point.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 8308da0..ca0edbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -917,6 +917,11 @@ static void assert_pch_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	u32 val;
>  	bool cur_state;
>  
> +	if (HAS_PCH_LPT(dev_priv->dev)) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("LPT detected: skipping PCH PLL test\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!intel_crtc->pch_pll) {
>  		WARN(1, "asserting PCH PLL enabled with no PLL\n");
>  		return;
> @@ -1102,6 +1107,11 @@ static void assert_pch_refclk_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	u32 val;
>  	bool enabled;
>  
> +	if (HAS_PCH_LPT(dev_priv->dev)) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("LPT does not has PCH refclk, skipping check\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	val = I915_READ(PCH_DREF_CONTROL);
>  	enabled = !!(val & (DREF_SSC_SOURCE_MASK | DREF_NONSPREAD_SOURCE_MASK |
>  			    DREF_SUPERSPREAD_SOURCE_MASK));

Hm this makes me think we might want separate crtc enable/disable
functions for HSW instead, when combined with a couple of the other
checks.

Up to you...

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center