From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: Newbie grief Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 16:56:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20120504155606.GB30130@sirena.org.uk> References: <86mx5rmx32.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4FA055D0.7040102@palm.com> <86aa1rmvhb.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4FA05E9F.9090709@palm.com> <4FA2D1D7.3020807@palm.com> <4FA2D97A.8090504@palm.com> <86ipgdhvjo.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4FA2F013.3020904@palm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Randal L. Schwartz" , Nathan Gray , PJ Weisberg , Sitaram Chamarty , Ted Ts'o , Seth Robertson , "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Rich Pixley X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 04 17:56:28 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SQKrq-0005Mi-4K for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 17:56:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751378Ab2EDP4U (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2012 11:56:20 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:44863 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751182Ab2EDP4T (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2012 11:56:19 -0400 Received: from broonie by cassiel.sirena.org.uk with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SQKrW-0000a0-7V; Fri, 04 May 2012 16:56:06 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FA2F013.3020904@palm.com> X-Cookie: Swap read error. You lose your mind. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:52:35PM -0700, Rich Pixley wrote: > It's not just hg. It's other source code control systems as well. > Check out any of the other daggy guys. So sure, I'll admit a bias > for current technology over older tech. I'm still not sure what's missing here without a central server? The other DVCSs I've used (which don't include hg) do require that the user trigger a merge operation somehow; they don't magically go and merge things without being asked. The only thing I've noticed that git does differently is that it caches the remote branches locally by default when remotes are set up.