From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shawn.guo@linaro.org (Shawn Guo) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 00:12:13 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 0/5] more clk-next fixes In-Reply-To: <1336367310-5140-1-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org> References: <1336367310-5140-1-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20120508161211.GI2199@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:08:25PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > If no one complains about these then I'll commit them to clk-next and > (finally) send my pull request to Arnd. > On mach-mxs: Tested-by: Shawn Guo Mike, I haven't seen too many outstanding comments on these patches, except the following one that Saravana put on clk-fixed-factor.c, which should be easy to fix. " > + return (parent_rate / fix->div) * fix->mult; Wouldn't multiplying and then dividing result in better accuracy? " Can you please quickly fix it and publish the patches on your clk-next, so that I can ask Arnd to pull my platform porting, on which mach-mxs device tree series depends. -- Regards, Shawn