From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Djelic Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: OMAP3: gpmc: add BCH ecc api and modes Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 17:17:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20120510151725.GA11107@parrot.com> References: <1335442669-13474-1-git-send-email-ivan.djelic@parrot.com> <20120509002927.GF5088@atomide.com> <20120509081047.GC17333@parrot.com> <20120509153141.GI5088@atomide.com> <1336655257.2625.8.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Received: from co202.xi-lite.net ([149.6.83.202]:33096 "EHLO co202.xi-lite.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759900Ab2EJPR3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2012 11:17:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1336655257.2625.8.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Artem Bityutskiy Cc: Tony Lindgren , "afzal@ti.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 02:07:37PM +0100, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 08:31 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Note that I could prepare a new MTD patch with BCH ecc code included, > > > allowing to drop the GPMC BCH ecc api. > > > > OK, let's do that then. I'll drop this patch and you can coordinate > > your patch with Afzal. > > Ivan, so are you going to send new patches early enough to make them hit > 3.5? Can you please then re-send all the dependent patches again and > again describe what depends on what, because I am getting lost :-) Yes, I agree this has become a bit confusing. I currently have 2 pending patches: [1] ARM-OMAP3-gpmc-add-BCH-ecc-api-and-modes_v3.patch (linux-omap) [2] mtd-nand-omap-add-support-for-hardware-BCH-ecc_v2.patch (linux-mtd) They should both be dropped. I will basically merge the two patches and submit a new single patch on MTD only, with no dependency. I won't need to patch arch/arm/mach-omap2 anymore. But in order to do so, I need the changes that Afzal has submitted (in particular [3]). Those changes (and as a consequence, my new patch) won't hit 3.5. So, when Afzal's patches are pushed, I'll submit a new, single MTD patch. BR, -- Ivan [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-April/040965.html [2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-April/041020.html [3] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-May/041105.html