From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sarah Sharp Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] usb/acpi: Add support usb port power off mechanism for device fixed on the motherboard Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 18:47:26 -0700 Message-ID: <20120515014726.GL18754@xanatos> References: <4FAD3A51.4010803@intel.com> <20120511183543.GF7920@kroah.com> <20120511201124.GF18754@xanatos> <20120511210940.8350.qmail@stuge.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:64810 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751079Ab2EOBrj (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2012 21:47:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120511210940.8350.qmail@stuge.se> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH , Alan Stern , Lan Tianyu , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:09:40PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > Sarah Sharp wrote: > > Theoretically there's no maximum number for xHCI root ports > > Hm? Please clarify this? > > HCSPARAMS1 MaxPorts is 8 bits and "Valid values are in the range of > 1h to FFh." Sorry, yes, you're correct, the maximum number of ports for xHCI is 255. I was just trying to point out that it's possible that xHCI hosts will have a much larger number of USB ports than what we've previously seen on EHCI host controllers. Sarah Sharp