From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: tegra: dt2 branch Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:43:25 +0000 Message-ID: <201205151143.26008.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1337016017-30537-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <201205142037.08752.arnd@arndb.de> <4FB170F3.8080107@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FB170F3.8080107-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Stephen Warren , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Monday 14 May 2012, Stephen Warren wrote: > I wonder if the changes to tegra-*.dtsi shouldn't just be dropped? I'd > personally err on the side of requiring board files to add this > property, rather than having things accidentally work because the .dtsi > file included a default. I ended up redoing the merge because I found an embarrasing typo in my patch and now dropped the property for the dtsi files. > BTW, I assume that in 3.6, I should plan to remove the support-8bit > properties and associated Tegra SDHCI driver code that handles them, and > rely on the SDHCI core handling this from now on? I think we can't drop it from the driver because of existing powerpc machines providing the property, but it would be ok if you drop it from your .dts files. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:43:25 +0000 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: tegra: dt2 branch In-Reply-To: <4FB170F3.8080107@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1337016017-30537-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <201205142037.08752.arnd@arndb.de> <4FB170F3.8080107@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <201205151143.26008.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 14 May 2012, Stephen Warren wrote: > I wonder if the changes to tegra-*.dtsi shouldn't just be dropped? I'd > personally err on the side of requiring board files to add this > property, rather than having things accidentally work because the .dtsi > file included a default. I ended up redoing the merge because I found an embarrasing typo in my patch and now dropped the property for the dtsi files. > BTW, I assume that in 3.6, I should plan to remove the support-8bit > properties and associated Tegra SDHCI driver code that handles them, and > rely on the SDHCI core handling this from now on? I think we can't drop it from the driver because of existing powerpc machines providing the property, but it would be ok if you drop it from your .dts files. Arnd