From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: oprofile and ARM A9 hardware counter Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:52:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20120515135228.GD10057@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20120510084422.GB27276@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FAC0F05.3060803@ti.com> <20120511122547.GE17453@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FAD1865.70003@ti.com> <20120511134920.GC2626@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FAD27CB.5060102@ti.com> <20120511150223.GD2626@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FAD3EF3.4080409@ti.com> <20120511163831.GI2626@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FADA5E4.80006@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:53385 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758090Ab2EONwz (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 09:52:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FADA5E4.80006@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: "Cousson, Benoit" , Kevin Hilman , Paul Walmsley , Ming Lei , Maynard Johnson , "Shilimkar, Santosh" , "oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net" , Lik Lik , "eranian@gmail.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:51:00AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 05/11/2012 11:38 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > Excellent, that works for me. Once we've worked out the problem with my > > .config you can have my tested-by. > > Great! I have been looking at your .config, but I have not been able to > figure out the problem so far. Do you recall what your config is based > upon? I seems quite different to mine and the omap2plus_defconfig has > not changed much in the last few kernel releases. Hmm, I'm honestly not sure -- it was just lying around in my home directory. Given that I know very little about OMAP, I would suspect that it's either based on the defconfig or I inherited a working kernel image from somebody else and used /proc/config.gz to build my own. Will From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:52:28 +0100 Subject: oprofile and ARM A9 hardware counter In-Reply-To: <4FADA5E4.80006@ti.com> References: <20120510084422.GB27276@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FAC0F05.3060803@ti.com> <20120511122547.GE17453@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FAD1865.70003@ti.com> <20120511134920.GC2626@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FAD27CB.5060102@ti.com> <20120511150223.GD2626@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FAD3EF3.4080409@ti.com> <20120511163831.GI2626@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FADA5E4.80006@ti.com> Message-ID: <20120515135228.GD10057@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:51:00AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 05/11/2012 11:38 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > Excellent, that works for me. Once we've worked out the problem with my > > .config you can have my tested-by. > > Great! I have been looking at your .config, but I have not been able to > figure out the problem so far. Do you recall what your config is based > upon? I seems quite different to mine and the omap2plus_defconfig has > not changed much in the last few kernel releases. Hmm, I'm honestly not sure -- it was just lying around in my home directory. Given that I know very little about OMAP, I would suspect that it's either based on the defconfig or I inherited a working kernel image from somebody else and used /proc/config.gz to build my own. Will