From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753955Ab2E1HOa (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2012 03:14:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:62273 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753587Ab2E1HO2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2012 03:14:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:14:21 +0900 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Linus Walleij Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rabin Vincent Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] driver core: always handle dpm_order Message-ID: <20120528071421.GB3014@kroah.com> References: <1335165396-23604-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20120423154342.GB23990@kroah.com> <20120424143624.GB3438@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:38:09PM +0800, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:11:09PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > >> wrote: > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:16:36AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> >> From: Rabin Vincent > >> >> > >> >> If !dev->class, device_move() does not respect the dpm_order. > >> >> Fix it to do so. > >> >> > >> >> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki > >> >> Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent > >> >> Reviewed-by: Srinidhi Kasagar > >> >> [Fixed a small dangling label compile warning] > >> >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > >> >> --- > >> >>  drivers/base/core.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ > >> >>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > Is this a problem in 3.4?  Older kernels?  Or can it wait for 3.5? > >> > >> Rabin said earlier that it could wait for 3.4 atleast. > > > > That didn't answer my question at all.  Oh well, 3.5 it is... > > Is this going upstream in this merge window? I haven't seen it > in Torvalds' tree, but I guess it may be pending for a late > merge...? Nope, it missed 3.5 as no one ever answered my questions, so I guessed that no one really cares about this :( greg k-h