From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:44:22 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] mxsboot: stop referring to i.MX28 as this
	ought to work for all i.MXS SoCs
In-Reply-To: <1336866018-614-5-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br>
References: <1336866018-614-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br>
	<1336866018-614-5-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Message-ID: <20120529204422.8B5F62073AD@gemini.denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Otavio Salvador,

In message <1336866018-614-5-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
> ---
>  tools/mxsboot.c |  110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/mxsboot.c b/tools/mxsboot.c
> index 6c05aa4..9661a48 100644
> --- a/tools/mxsboot.c
> +++ b/tools/mxsboot.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  /*
> - * Freescale i.MX28 image generator
> + * Freescale i.MXS image generator

I'm unhappy about the name "i.MXS".  Either we say "i.MX28" - then
it's clear we mean a specific FSL SoC, identified by it's product
name.  Or we say "mxs" like allover the place in the Linux and U-Boot
code.

But I haven't seen "i.MXS" used before, and to me it makes no sense as
it mixes unrelated name spaces.

Please either use the Freescale name(s), or use "mxs".

Thanks.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Copy from one, it's plagiarism; copy from two, it's research.