From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK packets Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:46:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120601.134659.621228924477728327.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1338501397.2760.1395.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120531.190345.1754322784813248328.davem@davemloft.net> <1338526137.2760.1425.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ncardwell@google.com, therbert@google.com, brouer@redhat.com To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:42753 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759848Ab2FARyz (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:54:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1338526137.2760.1425.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 06:48:57 +0200 > RFC is like 'I throw a patch, I am not even 50% confident of it, please > comment and fix my bugs'. Most busy people just ignore it. And I will ignore it too if you put RFC in the subject line :)