From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:52:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
In-Reply-To: <4FCDE3D7.9030006@linaro.org>
References: <1334325909-5779-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <1334325909-5779-7-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <CACRpkdYyP=V=aXtDuo_W4oDxH0UkQKq1x1HKG_z=zWHoWng6JQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F8BE5B0.4000900@linaro.org> <20120604101447.GF8262@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <4FCDE3D7.9030006@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20120605105249.GK8262@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:47:51AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 04/06/12 11:14, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > So why is this buggy patch now merged in the mainline kernel?
> 
> I guess Chris took it because you said it was fine?

Err, no.  If you re-read the thread, you'll see that I said your
subsequent patch posted on Thu, 03 May 2012 16:30:48 +0100 with
the devm_kzalloc() was fine.

The one which was merged is the one without the devm_kzalloc() which
is _not_ fine, because it's an oops waiting to happen - the one I
replied yesterday to without the devm_kzalloc().