From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755408Ab2FKP5v (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:57:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:55570 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751659Ab2FKP5t (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:57:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:51:28 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Lee Jones Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, Grant Likely , Alessandro Zummo , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] rtc: ab8500-rtc: IRQF_ONESHOT when requesting a threaded IRQ Message-ID: <20120611155128.GA18005@kroah.com> References: <1339428307-3850-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1339428307-3850-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <201206111531.20468.arnd@arndb.de> <4FD610AE.7010001@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD610AE.7010001@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:37:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 11/06/12 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >On Monday 11 June 2012, Lee Jones wrote: > >>The kernel now forces IRQs to be ONESHOT if no IRQ handler is passed. > >> > >>Cc: Alessandro Zummo > >>Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com > >>Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > > >Isn't this a bug fix that should be applied to the stable kernels too? > > Possibly. Should we alert Greg (CC'ed - alerted)? This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to do this properly. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:51:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 01/14] rtc: ab8500-rtc: IRQF_ONESHOT when requesting a threaded IRQ In-Reply-To: <4FD610AE.7010001@linaro.org> References: <1339428307-3850-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1339428307-3850-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <201206111531.20468.arnd@arndb.de> <4FD610AE.7010001@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20120611155128.GA18005@kroah.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:37:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 11/06/12 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >On Monday 11 June 2012, Lee Jones wrote: > >>The kernel now forces IRQs to be ONESHOT if no IRQ handler is passed. > >> > >>Cc: Alessandro Zummo > >>Cc: rtc-linux at googlegroups.com > >>Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > > >Isn't this a bug fix that should be applied to the stable kernels too? > > Possibly. Should we alert Greg (CC'ed - alerted)? This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to do this properly.