From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756129Ab2FNNmx (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:42:53 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:59154 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756028Ab2FNNmw (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:42:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:42:44 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Alessio Igor Bogani , Andrew Morton , Avi Kivity , Chris Metcalf , Christoph Lameter , Daniel Lezcano , Geoff Levand , Gilad Ben Yossef , Hakan Akkan , Kevin Hilman , Max Krasnyansky , "Paul E. McKenney" , Stephen Hemminger , Steven Rostedt , Sven-Thorsten Dietrich , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , "Luck,Tony" Subject: Re: [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Basic cputime accounting for adaptive tickless Message-ID: <20120614134238.GD16848@somewhere> References: <1339604397-8758-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1339664829.2559.14.camel@twins> <20120614111241.GA16848@somewhere> <20120614111638.GA16676@gmail.com> <20120614112241.GB16848@somewhere> <20120614144815.1401af49@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120614144815.1401af49@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:48:15PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:22:45 +0200 > Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:21:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > > You're right, I should have looked into CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING sooner > > > > > and see if I can reuse it. > > > > > > > > > > I'll try something with that. > > > > > > > > Maybe sanitize all the variants under a single set of > > > > wrappers/callbacks? > > > > > > Yes, please! > > > > Sure, I'm working in it. > > Please keep me in the loop, I want to avoid that things break on s390. Thanks. Do you have any idea why s390 counts idle time from asm deep in the idle code rather than just hooking in account_system_vtime() like ppc or ia64?