From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from seketeli.net ([91.121.166.71] helo=ms.seketeli.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh4hT-0007gI-9g for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:06:55 +0200 Received: from localhost (unknown [109.190.26.176]) by ms.seketeli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEAEEA040; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:03:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 42734604DE; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:56:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:56:11 +0200 From: Apelete Seketeli To: Martin Jansa Message-ID: <20120619195610.GC4845@hermes> References: <1340062930-19293-1-git-send-email-apelete@seketeli.net> <1340062930-19293-2-git-send-email-apelete@seketeli.net> <20120619052932.GN3178@jama.jama.net> <20120619060703.GA4845@hermes> <20120619063448.GO3178@jama.jama.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120619063448.GO3178@jama.jama.net> X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid X-URL: http://www.seketeli.net/~apelete User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org, Kristoffer Ericson Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gtk+: Regenerate no-demos.patch and update recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:06:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 19-Jun-12, Martin Jansa a =E9crit: >=20 > As you can see in > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/recipes/gtk+?id=3Da3b09= 20d0cc2cecac9eea4993ad18a64b207d7af > and > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/recipes/gtk+?id=3Da3b09= 20d0cc2cecac9eea4993ad18a64b207d7af >=20 > no-demos.patch is intentionally applied only for gtk+-native and even > correctly packaged for target. So if you have issues building > gtk+_2.20.1.bb then rebasing gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch is right, but > moving that patch from SRC_URI_append_virtclass-native to SRC_URI_appen= d > is wrong. I see. I will undo the move to SRC_URI_append, keep the no-demos.patch rebase thing and propose another to patch to fix the build issue then. > BTW: I'm not using oe-classic at all, and I'm still reading oe-devel ML= , please=20 > don't put me to To: directly, Thanks. I wasn't sure if I should put you in the To: field directly or not, thank you for clarifying this. The next patches will be sent to the mailing list address only, I hope you will still take some time to report and advise about any issue you spot :). Regards. --=20 Apelete