From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/29] ARM: omap: clk: use clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:41:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20120620114149.GG12766@atomide.com> References: <1339678038-23082-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1339678038-23082-5-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <20120614191147.GP19410@gmail.com> <4FDAC07A.7020702@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:19208 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753163Ab2FTLlw (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:41:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FDAC07A.7020702@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Rajendra Nayak Cc: Mike Turquette , paul@pwsan.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org * Rajendra Nayak [120614 22:01]: > On Friday 15 June 2012 12:41 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: > >On 20120614-18:16, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >>As we move to Common clk framework use clk_prepare_enable() > >>instead of clk_enable() and similarly clk_disable_unprepare() > >>instead of clk_disable() > >> > >>Based on initial changes from Mike turquette. Sounds like these kind of patches should be a separate series to prepare for the common clk fwk conversion? It seems these could already get merged separately? Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:41:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 04/29] ARM: omap: clk: use clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare In-Reply-To: <4FDAC07A.7020702@ti.com> References: <1339678038-23082-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1339678038-23082-5-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <20120614191147.GP19410@gmail.com> <4FDAC07A.7020702@ti.com> Message-ID: <20120620114149.GG12766@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Rajendra Nayak [120614 22:01]: > On Friday 15 June 2012 12:41 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: > >On 20120614-18:16, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >>As we move to Common clk framework use clk_prepare_enable() > >>instead of clk_enable() and similarly clk_disable_unprepare() > >>instead of clk_disable() > >> > >>Based on initial changes from Mike turquette. Sounds like these kind of patches should be a separate series to prepare for the common clk fwk conversion? It seems these could already get merged separately? Tony