All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	". James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: deferring __fput()
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:01:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120623210141.GK14083@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120623203800.GA10306@redhat.com>

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:38:00PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> > Matter of fact, it would become identical to struct rcu_head
> > after that...
> 
> This is not clear to me... Why this is good?

Occam's Razor.

> I understand that sizeof(task_work) == sizeof(rcu_head) would be
> nice, probably you meant just this?

More than that - the callback type is also the same (pointer to such
struct -> void).  IOW, they both look like two instances of the
same thing ("list of callbacks"), differing only in what and
when does calling.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-23 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-22 12:44 deferring __fput() Mimi Zohar
2012-06-23  9:20 ` Al Viro
2012-06-23 19:45   ` Al Viro
2012-06-23 20:38     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-23 21:01       ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-06-23 21:11         ` Al Viro
2012-06-24  4:16         ` Al Viro
2012-06-24 10:09           ` Al Viro
2012-06-24 16:54             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-24 15:33           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-25  6:03             ` Al Viro
2012-06-25 15:18               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:37                 ` [PATCH 0/4] Was: " Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:37                   ` [PATCH 1/4] task_work: use the single-linked list to shrink sizeof(task_work) Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:37                   ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: don't rely on PF_EXITING Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:38                   ` [PATCH 3/4] task_work: deal with task_work callbacks adding more work Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:38                   ` [PATCH 4/4] task_work: kill task_work->data Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 19:05                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-28  4:38                   ` [PATCH 0/4] Was: deferring __fput() Al Viro
2012-06-28 16:22                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-28 16:45                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-30  6:24                         ` Al Viro
2012-06-30 17:41                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-29  5:30                     ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-29  8:33                       ` Al Viro
2012-06-29 13:02                         ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-29 17:41                           ` Al Viro
2012-06-29 21:38                             ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-29 23:56                               ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-30  5:02                                 ` Al Viro
2012-07-01 19:50                                   ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-01 20:57                                     ` Al Viro
2012-07-02  1:46                                       ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-02  3:43                                         ` Al Viro
2012-07-02  5:11                                           ` Al Viro
2012-07-02 11:49                                             ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-02 12:02                                               ` Al Viro
2012-07-02 13:01                                                 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-02 13:33                                                   ` Al Viro
2012-07-02 14:50                                                     ` Mimi Zohar
2012-08-21 13:05                                                       ` [PATCH] task_work: add a scheduling point in task_work_run() Eric Dumazet
2012-08-21 20:37                                                         ` Mimi Zohar
2012-08-21 21:32                                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22  3:13                                                             ` Mimi Zohar
2012-08-22  5:27                                                         ` Michael Wang
2012-08-22  5:38                                                           ` Al Viro
2012-06-23 20:57     ` deferring __fput() Al Viro
2012-06-23 21:33       ` Al Viro
2012-06-24 15:20       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-24 18:11         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-25 12:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-25 12:14         ` Al Viro
2012-06-25 13:19           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-25 13:53             ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120623210141.GK14083@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.