On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:09:56PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> Just making sure I parsed that right. I think what you're saying is
> that the device itself should represent its input pins, e.g.:
> 
> tps6586x {
>     vin-ldo01-supply = <&some_regulator>;

Yes, that's what I'd expect here.

> ... rather than each regulator specifying its parent, which might
> result in some duplication, since in this case both ldo0/1 are
> supplied from the same input pin:

Plus you then get back to the problem of users having to figure out
where to put the references which makes everything harder to use.