From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754036Ab2FZVkA (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:40:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:33589 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750893Ab2FZVj7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:39:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:39:54 -0700 From: Greg KH To: KY Srinivasan Cc: "apw@canonical.com" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "virtualization@lists.osdl.org" , "ohering@suse.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp Message-ID: <20120626213954.GA4840@kroah.com> References: <1340314200-27078-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <20120621224737.GA5933@kroah.com> <426367E2313C2449837CD2DE46E7EAF9155EC47A@SN2PRD0310MB382.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <20120622132547.GA2639@kroah.com> <426367E2313C2449837CD2DE46E7EAF9155ED14D@SN2PRD0310MB382.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <426367E2313C2449837CD2DE46E7EAF9155ED14D@SN2PRD0310MB382.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:29:49AM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] > > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:26 AM > > To: KY Srinivasan > > Cc: apw@canonical.com; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; ohering@suse.com; > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; virtualization@lists.osdl.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:06:53PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > Are you still missing it; do you want me to resend the whole set? > > > > Nope, it showed up a few hours later, thanks. You really should get > > that fixed... > > Greg, some additional testing with VM replication on Windows Server > 2012 has revealed some issues with this patch-set. Please drop the > patch set, I will fix the problem and resend it. Thanks for letting me know, now dropped. But, for the next round, I suggest you run this patchset by the netdev developers, as I think you are doing things in an "odd" way for some of the ip determination. thanks, greg k-h